Registered_Guest
New member
In another thread on the main forum, this was posted:
PPG2270:
And I understand.
My question is - at what “pay scheme” should people be more than willing to take those risks? How does someone determine that $8/hr is not enough to risk getting shot, but $12 is enough to risk getting shot?
Is it a matter of money, or a matter of safety? I’m trying to understand how the two things have anything to do with each other.
PPG2270:
I’ve often heard this - or some variance of it - “I’m not getting paid enough to take those risks” sort of thing.…how many Starbucks employees get robbed at gunpoint for the cash in their pocket and a cup of coffee? No one should be taking these risks for the current pay scheme.
And I understand.
My question is - at what “pay scheme” should people be more than willing to take those risks? How does someone determine that $8/hr is not enough to risk getting shot, but $12 is enough to risk getting shot?
Is it a matter of money, or a matter of safety? I’m trying to understand how the two things have anything to do with each other.
Last edited: