They take CC’s right ? lolI tend to agree, but the only people who typically benefit from those suits are the law firms.
Last edited:
They take CC’s right ? lolI tend to agree, but the only people who typically benefit from those suits are the law firms.
I’m guessing you didn’t understand my statement. So, I’ll spell it out;They take CC’s right ? lol
Yeah, about that!With all of the talk over minimum wage increases of up to $15 an hour over the next few years… it would be nice to have a ‘win’ in this area.
well that does not work well for me…This is posted at delco and presto does not take CC and Sysco also told me there is a 7% fee on CC purchasesAt least I pay Sysco and US food by CC and go on vacation with the points… small compensation for the amount of CC fees I pay each year though.
So… who is it that has your credit card info? We go out of our way never to store customer card info.The genius part for the coffee shop is that they only charge my credit card once a month
For one, he’s probably not saying anything. It’s probably a cut and paste response put together that his office sends people. He most likely never saw your message. But basically, it’s saying “It’s not my fault. I tried to fight it. Vote for more of my party and we’ll fight for you.” I’m just jaded because neither party really cares about small business specifically. It’s all about if you have enough money to lobby them or not and the big guys always will. All we can do is hope it affects someone more powerful than we are, and we can ride the coattails of the change their dollars bring. Both parties have had their time in charge and have done about the same damage. I just chalk it up to the cost of doing business and, one way or another, pass those costs along in my final product.Does anyone understand what this guy is trying to say?
That is just the verbal version of smoke being blown up your bunghole in the form of a canned response clearly written in leaglese with a midwestern dialect.Here’s a copy of the response I received from my state representative.
Thank you for contacting me regarding financial regulation and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-203). I appreciate having the benefit of your comments on this matter.
I share the concerns of many Texans that Dodd-Frank will do more harm than good to our economy and our financial system. I voted against this legislation because it dramatically increases the size and scope of the federal bureaucracy and institutionalizes “too big to fail”—the notion that Washington will bail out certain large financial firms if necessary. Such implicit government protection distorts our credit system by making it easier for a select number of massive companies to raise capital. This puts the small business community, which was not responsible for the financial crisis, at a competitive disadvantage. Without adequate access to credit, small businesses cannot pay their employees, and working families cannot receive the loans necessary to send their children to college or purchase a new home or car.
I understand the challenges that small and community banks face in today’s regulatory environment and appreciate the difficulties many experience in the regulatory examination process. For this reason, in the 113th Congress, I cosponsored the Financial Institutions Examination Fairness and Reform Act (S. 727), which would have provided much needed relief to community and local financial institutions by requiring federal regulators to provide a final examination report to financial firms, streamline the regulatory treatment of certain loans, and establish a new appeals process for lenders. I also cosponsored the Financial Regulatory Responsibility Act of 2013 (S. 450), which would have held financial regulators accountable for rigorous, consistent economic analysis on every new rule they propose. Both bills would have improved the transparency and accountability of the regulatory process and reduced the burdens imposed on our community lenders. Although S. 727 and S. 450 were not enacted prior to the adjournment of the 113th Congress, you may be certain that I will keep your views in mind as Congress considers legislation affecting financial regulatory reform during the 114th Congress.
I am honored to represent Texas in the United States Senate. Thank you for taking the time to contact me.
Sincerely,
JOHN CORNYN
United States Senator
Does anyone understand what this guy is trying to say?