S
system
Guest
I read the board a lot but this is my first post. I have read all the information on valuations, and I am a former owner. (Tried the corporate life but it did not take).
I am going to buy a place to get back into the market quickly (or so I think). It used to be that we bought and sold on profits. We used to calculate profit as the amount of money made over and above paying someone fair wage to take your place (call it GM or staff) in the shop. My rule of thumb was 15%-17% of gross was profit over and above your wage was a good day.
In dealing with brokers now, I see them asking for multiples of Owners Cash Flow, but it is the owners cash flow that I question. They seem to think when the owner works some kind of crazy 82 hours a week instead of paying staff, the money they save becomes part of the profit number you should pay for. Has the market changed that much that people are now buying jobs and paying multiples for their own salary (or expected salary)?
Here is a hypothetical example with some rounded numbers of what I keep seeing:
Gross = 300k I would have said 68% cost - Fixed = Profit. Therefore, Buy it for 2 * Profit plus value of equipment.
( Before you ask here is how I get to 68%: Quick breakdown:28% of that is labor, 34% is food and paper, 7.5% indirect, Delivery 1.4% (decent mix say 40%)). My rule of thumb is on a lower volume shop you run on average fixed cost at 18% of gross (thats utils, insurance, rent, etc). I might have some regional PA flavor in my %s so CA and Australia owners might disagree.
Has the market changed that much that places would now sell for 40%-50% of gross without regard to profit? I ask the question because most of the valuation threads I see on this board indicate my numbers for cost %s still hold true but most places for sale look like totally different.
Thanks xtra_cheese.
I am going to buy a place to get back into the market quickly (or so I think). It used to be that we bought and sold on profits. We used to calculate profit as the amount of money made over and above paying someone fair wage to take your place (call it GM or staff) in the shop. My rule of thumb was 15%-17% of gross was profit over and above your wage was a good day.
In dealing with brokers now, I see them asking for multiples of Owners Cash Flow, but it is the owners cash flow that I question. They seem to think when the owner works some kind of crazy 82 hours a week instead of paying staff, the money they save becomes part of the profit number you should pay for. Has the market changed that much that people are now buying jobs and paying multiples for their own salary (or expected salary)?
Here is a hypothetical example with some rounded numbers of what I keep seeing:
Gross = 300k I would have said 68% cost - Fixed = Profit. Therefore, Buy it for 2 * Profit plus value of equipment.
( Before you ask here is how I get to 68%: Quick breakdown:28% of that is labor, 34% is food and paper, 7.5% indirect, Delivery 1.4% (decent mix say 40%)). My rule of thumb is on a lower volume shop you run on average fixed cost at 18% of gross (thats utils, insurance, rent, etc). I might have some regional PA flavor in my %s so CA and Australia owners might disagree.
Has the market changed that much that places would now sell for 40%-50% of gross without regard to profit? I ask the question because most of the valuation threads I see on this board indicate my numbers for cost %s still hold true but most places for sale look like totally different.
Thanks xtra_cheese.